Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A390
89 Imaging
62 Features
68 Overall
64
66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX1100
- Renewed by Samsung NX3000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released July 2010
- Older Model is Sony A380
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A390 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A390, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the NX2000 (20MP) and A390 (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (APS-C).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe NX2000 was introduced 3 years later than the A390 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the NX2000 matches up versus the A390 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung NX2000 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung NX2000 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Sony A390
| NX2000 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 | July 2010 | Fresher by 41 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3.7" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+1") | |
| Screen resolution | 1152k | 230k | Clearer screen (+922k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Samsung NX2000
| A390 | NX2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Samsung NX2000 and Sony A390
| NX2000 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung NX2000 provides outside dimensions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A390 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the NX2000 and the A390.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the NX2000 and A390 is 89 and 66 respectively.
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The photograph here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the NX2000 and A390.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung NX2000 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern NX2000 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Samsung NX2000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung NX2000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2013-11-30 | 2010-07-28 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 21 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Samsung NX | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 32 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,152 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 228g (0.50 lb) | 549g (1.21 lb) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 75 | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.4 | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 908 | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 230 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP1130 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $599 | $500 |