Samsung NX2000 vs Sony H200
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Launched November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX1100
- Updated by Samsung NX3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Revealed January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung NX2000 vs Sony H200 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Samsung NX2000 vs Sony H200, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the NX2000 (20MP) and the H200 (20MP) is pretty similar but the NX2000 (APS-C) and H200 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe NX2000 was manufactured 11 months after the H200 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the NX2000 grades against the H200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung NX2000 vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung NX2000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung NX2000 Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Sony H200
| NX2000 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2013 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 11 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3.7" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Samsung NX2000
| H200 | NX2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung NX2000 and Sony H200
| NX2000 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung NX2000 features external measurements of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Check out the Samsung NX2000 vs Sony H200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the NX2000 and the H200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the NX2000 and H200 is 89 and 67 respectively.
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the NX2000 and H200.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The NX2000 includes the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult. The newer NX2000 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Samsung NX2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung NX2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-11-30 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 21 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Samsung NX | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 20cm |
| Available lenses | 32 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,152k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 228 gr (0.50 lbs) | 530 gr (1.17 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 75 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 908 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | BP1130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $599 | $250 |