Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a11/88a11bb02e0ad8b3bdbbf0916f24e031f73d8b87" alt="Samsung NX210 front Samsung NX210 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/954ca/954ca3d6b6a83048f769c1384f54ab181afa17ed" alt="Sony Alpha a6500 front Sony Alpha a6500 front"
81 Imaging
67 Features
85 Overall
74
Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Launched August 2012
- Older Model is Samsung NX200
- Refreshed by Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 453g - 120 x 67 x 53mm
- Revealed October 2016
- Replaced the Sony A6300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the NX210 (20MP) and the A6500 (24MP) is very comparable and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The NX210 was launched 5 years prior to the A6500 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the NX210 matches up against the A6500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung NX210 & Sony Alpha a6500. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung NX210 Gallery & Sony A6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Sony A6500
NX210 | A6500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6500 over the Samsung NX210
A6500 | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2016 | ![]() | August 2012 | Newer by 50 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung NX210 and Sony A6500
NX210 | A6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung NX210 comes with exterior measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony A6500 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 53mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the NX210 compared to the A6500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baa20/baa20b10e6cc0de68ae75e4e4b651f7ba17ffbd5" alt="Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 size comparison Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the NX210 and A6500 is 90 and 81 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1aeb5/1aeb5d020b73aaf46bbe0fcb5ba67fdcb9c9bdab" alt="Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 top view buttons comparison Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The picture below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the NX210 and A6500.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony A6500 to show greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged NX210 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f735/4f735bb6e25c0a935c91c67aa28081867ea30501" alt="Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 sensor size comparison Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 sensor size comparison"
Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e3fe/3e3fed3bb1bf21a2ccc090b1133b10ee8fcf64ab" alt="Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung NX210 vs Sony A6500 Specifications
Samsung NX210 | Sony Alpha a6500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung NX210 | Sony Alpha a6500 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-08-14 | 2016-10-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 15 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Samsung NX | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 32 | 121 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 614k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | Active Matrix OLED screen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 453 gr (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 120 x 67 x 53mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 71 | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 24.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 719 | 1405 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 350 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BC1030 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $625 | $1,298 |