Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300 front Samsung NX300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d6c3/8d6c3208a98a04c133c77814dcb12d444671965b" alt="Samsung TL240 front Samsung TL240 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX210
- Updated by Samsung NX500
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Samsung NX300 versus Samsung TL240, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact and both are designed by Samsung. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the NX300 (20MP) and TL240 (14MP) and the NX300 (APS-C) and TL240 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The NX300 was released 3 years after the TL240 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the NX300 scores versus the TL240 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung NX300 and Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung NX300 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Samsung TL240
NX300 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 48 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 768k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+538k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Samsung NX300
TL240 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3.3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Samsung NX300 and Samsung TL240
NX300 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Samsung NX300 has external dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung NX300 versus Samsung TL240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the NX300 versus the TL240.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07b4e/07b4edf6c185602bf299958712f609abfe6f2a16" alt="Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the NX300 and TL240 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/409f5/409f527c4da1f4150679fa28ee5e2092c5886f26" alt="Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specifications. The picture here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the NX300 and TL240.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The NX300 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung NX300 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The newer NX300 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6060/a6060a664bd35dd9153a5b886ff3a65fcb57e648" alt="Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison"
Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b6a2/0b6a273cacc1cd546b178ec0acbba1262faf41a1" alt="Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Samsung NX300 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Samsung NX300 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung NX300 | Samsung TL240 |
Also called as | - | ST5000 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-11-24 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DRIMe IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4334 x 3256 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 4800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 247 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Samsung NX | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 32 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.3" | 3.5" |
Display resolution | 768 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | Active Matrix OLED screen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 331g (0.73 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 76 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 942 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BP1130 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $750 | $171 |