Samsung NX300 vs Sony A290
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Samsung NX300 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX210
- Replacement is Samsung NX500
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung NX300 vs Sony A290 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Samsung NX300 versus Sony A290, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the NX300 (20MP) and A290 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Photography GlossaryThe NX300 was launched 3 years after the A290 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the NX300 scores versus the A290 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung NX300 vs Sony A290 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung NX300 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung NX300 Gallery and Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Sony A290
| NX300 | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3.3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 768k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+538k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Samsung NX300
| A290 | NX300 |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung NX300 and Sony A290
| NX300 | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung NX300 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung NX300 provides external measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung NX300 versus Sony A290 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the NX300 compared to the A290.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the NX300 and A290 is 86 and 66 respectively.
Samsung NX300 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the NX300 and A290.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung NX300 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent NX300 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Samsung NX300 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung NX300 vs Sony A290 Specifications
| Samsung NX300 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung NX300 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2013-11-24 | 2010-06-09 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DRIMe IV | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 247 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Samsung NX | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 32 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 768k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Active Matrix OLED screen | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 331 grams (0.73 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 76 | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 942 | 615 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | 290 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP1130 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $750 | $600 |