Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300 front Samsung NX300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a8dd/4a8dd561f31a1ef05032a3f55300768a5c6ad484" alt="Sony Alpha a3500 front Sony Alpha a3500 front"
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX210
- Replacement is Samsung NX500
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Released March 2014
- Replaced the Sony A3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the NX300 (20MP) and the a3500 (20MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The NX300 was brought out 3 months before the a3500 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the NX300 grades versus the a3500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung NX300 & Sony Alpha a3500. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung NX300 Gallery & Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Sony a3500
NX300 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 768k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+538k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Samsung NX300
a3500 | NX300 |
---|
Common features in the Samsung NX300 and Sony a3500
NX300 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2013 | ![]() | March 2014 | Similar age |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung NX300 comes with outside measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs) whilst the Sony a3500 has specifications of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the NX300 and the a3500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae8a2/ae8a273558112c322e17b99e239435ac36e99fe8" alt="Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 size comparison Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the NX300 and a3500 is 86 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a43f/1a43f8a0e7757895e552b6636f327d49da431605" alt="Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The graphic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the NX300 and a3500.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact MP so you can expect similar quality of files however you will want to take the launch date of the products into consideration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bef62/bef62b5459a44ebf05c9b6a748dcd103c455239a" alt="Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison"
Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5219/a5219dc1ec9d66b1031ac549a5ddd941260c7287" alt="Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung NX300 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Samsung NX300 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung NX300 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-11-24 | 2014-03-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DRIMe IV | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5456 x 3632 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 247 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Samsung NX | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 32 | 121 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 768 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Active Matrix OLED screen | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 331 gr (0.73 lb) | 411 gr (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 76 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 942 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 470 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP1130 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $750 | $398 |