Samsung NX300M vs Samsung ST65
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66


99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Samsung NX300M vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011

Samsung NX300M vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Samsung NX300M versus Samsung ST65, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are built by Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the NX300M (20MP) and ST65 (14MP) and the NX300M (APS-C) and ST65 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.

The NX300M was released 24 months after the ST65 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the NX300M grades against the ST65 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung NX300M vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung NX300M & Samsung ST65. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung NX300M Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Samsung ST65
NX300M | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 24 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 768k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+308k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Samsung NX300M
ST65 | NX300M |
---|
Common features in the Samsung NX300M and Samsung ST65
NX300M | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung NX300M vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung NX300M features outer measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs) while the Samsung ST65 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Samsung NX300M versus Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the NX300M compared to the ST65.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the NX300M and ST65 is 86 and 99 respectively.

Samsung NX300M vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the NX300M and ST65.
Clearly, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The NX300M due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung NX300M will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer NX300M should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung NX300M vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung NX300M vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
Samsung NX300M | Samsung ST65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung NX300M | Samsung ST65 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-01-03 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DRIMe IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 247 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Samsung NX | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | () |
Number of lenses | 32 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 768k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Active Matrix OLED screen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 331 gr (0.73 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BP1130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $699 | $130 |