Clicky

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68

Portability
86
Imaging
62
Features
73
Overall
66
Samsung NX300M front
 
Sony SLT-A68 front
Portability
64
Imaging
66
Features
70
Overall
67

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68 Key Specs

Samsung NX300M
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sony A68
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
  • Released November 2015
  • Old Model is Sony A65
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68 Overview

Following is a extensive comparison of the Samsung NX300M versus Sony A68, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the NX300M (20MP) and the A68 (24MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (APS-C).

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The NX300M was revealed 3 years prior to the A68 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the NX300M matches up vs the A68 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Sony A68

 NX300M A68 
Screen dimensions3.3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution768k461kCrisper screen (+307k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Samsung NX300M

 A68 NX300M 
ReleasedNovember 2015January 2013More modern by 34 months

Common features in the Samsung NX300M and Sony A68

 NX300M A68 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung NX300M has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs) and the Sony A68 has measurements of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Samsung NX300M versus Sony A68 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the NX300M against the A68.

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the NX300M and A68 is 86 and 64 respectively.

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68 top view buttons comparison

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The pic below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the NX300M and A68.

All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Sony A68 to give greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged NX300M is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68 sensor size comparison

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung NX300M Portrait photography advice
Sony A68 Portrait photography advice
77
manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
79
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with face detect focusing
supports RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Samsung NX300M Street photography details
Sony A68 Street photography details
80
screen tilts
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
offers focus via touch
above average high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
77
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
above average ISO range (25,600)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Samsung NX300M Sports photography details
Sony A68 Sports photography details
72
maximum shutter speed is high (1/6,000s)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect autofocus
lack of image stabilization
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
has phase detect AF
not so great battery pack (510 CIPA)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung NX300M Travel photography highlights
Sony A68 Travel photography highlights
66
offers focus via touch
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
54
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
not so great battery pack (510 per charge)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung NX300M
Landscape photography with Sony A68
72
manual focus
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen is a good size (3.3 inches)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse mode
67
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.7 inch)
not so great battery pack (510 CIPA)
no Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung NX300M as a Vlogging camera
Sony A68 as a Vlogging camera
33
touchscreen enabled
provides face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
no external mic socket
35
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has microphone socket
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung NX300M vs Sony A68 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung NX300M and Sony A68
 Samsung NX300MSony SLT-A68
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model Samsung NX300M Sony SLT-A68
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2013-01-03 2015-11-06
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor DRIMe IV Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5472 x 3648 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 247 79
Cross focus points - 15
Lens
Lens mounting type Samsung NX Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 32 143
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3.3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 768k dots 461k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech Active Matrix OLED screen -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.57x
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/6000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 9.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 331 grams (0.73 lb) 610 grams (1.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 79
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.5
DXO Low light score not tested 701
Other
Battery life 330 images 510 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BP1130 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec))
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $699 $581