Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9
87 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
![Samsung NX500 front Samsung NX500 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-NX500/Samsung-NX500-front.jpg)
![Sigma SD9 front Sigma SD9 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sigma-SD9/Sigma-SD9-front.jpg)
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replaced the Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- Replacement is Sigma SD10
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Samsung NX500 and Sigma SD9, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Samsung and Sigma. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the NX500 (28MP) and SD9 (3MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (APS-C).
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The NX500 was revealed 12 years after the SD9 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung NX500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the NX500 scores vs the SD9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung NX500 and Sigma SD9. The full galleries are available at Samsung NX500 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Sigma SD9
NX500 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | November 2002 | More modern by 149 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 130k | Sharper display (+906k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung NX500
SD9 | NX500 |
---|
Common features in the Samsung NX500 and Sigma SD9
NX500 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung NX500 comes with exterior measurements of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
See the Samsung NX500 and Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the NX500 vs the SD9.
![Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 size comparison Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-NX500-vs-Sigma-SD9-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the NX500 and SD9 is 87 and 54 respectively.
![Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-NX500-vs-Sigma-SD9-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The picture below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the NX500 and SD9.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung NX500 to offer you more detail because of its extra 25 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher NX500 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
![Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-NX500-vs-Sigma-SD9-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-NX500-vs-Sigma-SD9-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Samsung NX500 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Samsung NX500 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung NX500 | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DRIMe 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 28 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 6480 x 4320 | 2268 x 1512 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 400 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 209 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Samsung NX | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 32 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.8" |
Resolution of screen | 1,036 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/6000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 | - |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video format | H.265 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 287 gr (0.63 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 87 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1379 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BP1130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 - 30 secs) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $800 | $3,001 |