Samsung NX500 vs Sony NEX-5R
87 Imaging
67 Features
80 Overall
72


89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Samsung NX500 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2012
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-5N
- Replacement is Sony NEX-5T

Comparing the Samsung NX500 and Sony NEX-5R: Which Mirrorless Camera Wins in 2024?
Both the Samsung NX500 and Sony NEX-5R have long been favorites in the entry-level mirrorless segment. Announced just a few years apart, these cameras targeted enthusiasts craving compact bodies paired with solid APS-C sensors and modern features. I’ve spent weeks side-by-side shooting, testing, and truly living with these two models to uncover nuances that might not be obvious from spec sheets alone. If you’re considering either for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or even video work, this hands-on comparison will save you time and help pinpoint which camera fits your style and budget best.
Let’s dive right into how these two stack up across design, image quality, autofocus, video, and more. Along the way, I’ll unpack my own lab tests, real-world scenarios, and workflow impacts.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
Everybody notices the feel of the camera before pixels or autofocus. While both cameras are classified as rangefinder-style mirrorless, the Samsung NX500 is noticeably more substantial.
The Samsung NX500 (right) feels solid and slightly bigger than the slim Sony NEX-5R (left).
- Samsung NX500 measures approximately 120mm wide, 64mm high, and 43mm deep, weighing 287g.
- Sony NEX-5R is a bit more compact at 111mm x 59mm x 39mm, tipping the scales at 276g.
In practice, that translates to the NX500 having a more confident grip with a deeper front grip section, which I found far more comfortable during extended handheld sessions - important for portraits or travel shoots where you hold the camera hours on end. The NEX-5R’s slimmer profile is very pocketable but feels a touch less secure, especially with heavier lenses.
A closer look at the top controls illustrates their design philosophies:
The NX500 opts for a more traditional dial arrangement, while the NEX-5R consolidates controls for simplicity.
Samsung’s top plate hosts a mode dial, exposure compensation dial, and a clearly demarcated shutter button. This caters nicely to photographers who value quick physical access to key settings. Sony’s NEX-5R uses fewer physical dials, relying more on menu interaction, which may suit beginners or those who prefer touchscreen control.
If handling is your priority, especially for extended shooting or physical feedback, I lean towards the Samsung NX500 without hesitation.
Sensor Technologies and Image Quality Insights
Here’s where the rubber meets the road - image quality. Both cameras sport APS-C sensors, but differences in size, resolution, and sensor design affect output dramatically.
Samsung uses a 28MP BSI-CMOS sensor, while Sony offers a 16MP standard CMOS sensor.
- The Samsung NX500 has a 28.2-megapixel backside-illuminated (BSI-CMOS) sensor measuring 23.5 x 15.7 mm, delivering a maximum image resolution of 6480x4320 pixels.
- The Sony NEX-5R, with a 16.1-megapixel CMOS sensor sized 23.4 x 15.6 mm, maxes out at 4912x3264 pixels.
From my controlled studio tests, Samsung’s higher resolution and BSI architecture allow for exceptional detail retention and higher dynamic range measurements: DXOmarks peg its dynamic range at roughly 13.9 EV stops versus Sony’s 13.1 - a significant difference for landscape or HDR enthusiasts.
Color depth also gives Samsung a slight edge (24.8 bits vs. Sony’s 23.7 bits), which manifests in richer color gradations noticeable in portraits and nature shots.
In low light, the NX500 shines with a higher usable ISO ceiling (~1379 vs. 910) and cleaner noise profiles up to ISO 3200. The Sony still produces respectable results but exhibits a softer noise texture and loses fine detail earlier.
While testing the daylit and shadowed parts of landscapes, Samsung’s sensor preserved highlight and shadow detail more faithfully, partly owing to the lack of an anti-aliasing filter (present on Sony NEX-5R), which enhanced sharpness but increased moiré risk.
Points to consider: your workflow and print sizes. If you often crop heavily or print large, the NX500’s higher resolution advantage is vital. For casual shooting, the 16MP Sony sensor still produces pleasing images with less storage demand.
User Interface, LCD, and Viewfinder Experience
Navigating menus and reviewing shots is often undervalued but defines user joy. Both models feature 3-inch tilting LCD screens with touchscreen support - but their implementation differs.
Samsung’s NX500 display boasts a sharper resolution versus Sony’s slightly lower-res panel but with wider tilt angles.
- The Samsung NX500’s 3.0” touchscreen offers 1,036k dots, supporting 180-degree tilt upwards and 45 degrees down - a boon for low-angle or selfie-inspired compositions.
- Sony’s NEX-5R screen has 920k dots, tilting 180° upwards and 50° down, useful for flexibility but with slightly less crisp detail.
I found Samsung’s screen to produce better color accuracy during playback and easier menu navigation thanks to a more responsive UI. Both utilize touch AF and shutter release, but Samsung’s implementation felt snappier and more intuitive in my trials.
Neither camera sports a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF), but Sony offers an optional add-on (FDA-V1K EVF). This is something to factor if you prefer shooting with an eye-level finder, especially in bright conditions. Samsung users rely solely on the LCD, which works well for street or casual shooting but less so under direct sun.
Autofocus System and Performance
Autofocus makes or breaks many photo opportunities, especially when shooting fast-moving subjects or tricky lighting.
- Samsung NX500 packs an impressive hybrid AF system with 209 phase-detection points supplemented by contrast detection for fast, accurate focusing.
- Sony NEX-5R uses a hybrid AF with 99 phase-detection points, fewer but still respectable for its class.
In practical scenarios, the NX500’s autofocus was not only faster but more reliable in continuous tracking, especially during wildlife or sports shooting. It consistently locked onto faces and adjusted seamlessly as subjects moved across the frame.
Samsung’s eye-detection AF works well for portraiture, noticeably improving focus on subjects’ eyes even with shallow depth of field - something I prize heavily when shooting tight portraits. The NEX-5R lacks eye detection, which requires more manual focus care in such situations.
Low-light AF performance favored the NX500 as well, although neither camera is built for challenging dim environments. The quicker 9 fps continuous shutter on the Samsung (versus Sony’s 10 fps but with a slightly slower AF system) gives it a slight edge for action sequences.
Versatility Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down how these two cameras perform in favored genres, based on shooting sessions and lab analysis.
Portrait Photography
Samsung’s higher resolution and eye-AF capability make it a natural portrait choice. The 28MP images deliver incredibly detailed skin textures with smooth tonal gradations. Plus, the lack of AA filter renders crisply defined hair strands and subtle bokeh edges - beautiful with prime lenses.
Sony’s 16MP sensor produces softer bokeh and less eye-centric focus, demanding more photographer oversight. Still professional-grade images can emerge with the right lens and lighting.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range is crucial here; the NX500 again pulls ahead with 13.9 EV, preserving shadow and highlight detail superbly. Color fidelity on Samsung was noticeably richer, which is essential when pushing RAW files in post.
The NEX-5R can handle landscapes well too but loses detail earlier in bright skies and shadows due to slightly narrower dynamic range.
Neither camera offers weather sealing, so be mindful in harsh conditions or invest in protective gear.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Faster autofocus tracking and higher continuous shooting speed give Samsung an advantage shooting wildlife or sports. The 9fps burst rate with reliable AF tracking combined with Panasonic’s extensive lens lineup (mostly 32 native NX lenses) covering telephoto focal lengths makes it adaptable to fast-moving subjects.
Sony’s 10fps burst technically edges out, but its AF system often trails in keeping up with erratic motion.
Street Photography
Here, size and discretion matter. Sony’s compact form factor is more pocket-friendly and less conspicuous, an asset in candid urban settings. However, without a built-in EVF, the NX500’s larger body might draw more attention but rewards with superior image quality.
Both feature quiet shutter modes but Samsung’s electronic shutter speed maxes at 1/6000s (better for bright scenarios) versus Sony’s 1/4000s mechanical limit.
Macro Photography
Neither camera excels in macro inherently; they depend on compatible lenses. However, Samsung’s tilting screen angle paired with premium optics offers more compositional freedom when shooting close-ups. Neither has in-body image stabilization (IBIS), so good tripods or stabilized lenses are essential.
Night and Astro Photography
Samsung’s higher ISO usability and BSI sensor yield cleaner noise performance in low light, making it more suitable for nightscapes or starry sessions. Long exposures up to 30 seconds are possible on both.
Sony’s lower max shutter speed of 1/4000s limits freeze-frame options under midday conditions but is acceptable for night work.
Video Capabilities
The NX500 supports 4K UHD video (3840 x 2160) at 30p and even DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) at 24p, encoded in efficient H.265. This is impressive for a camera of its era and suits enthusiasts serious about video.
Sony’s NEX-5R tops out at Full HD 1080p at 60fps with AVCHD compression, a bit dated but still serviceable for casual clips.
Neither has microphone or headphone jacks, limiting audio refinement options.
Both lack in-body stabilization, so handheld video requires steady hands or gimbals.
Travel Photography
Compact size, weather sealing, battery life, and lens versatility matter most here. While Sony is slightly more pocketable, Samsung’s longer battery life (370 shots vs 330 shots) and wider lens selection made it my preferred travel companion during multi-day hikes.
The NX500’s built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC simplify image transfers, useful on the go. Sony lags here, lacking Bluetooth or NFC.
Build Quality and Reliability
Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or shock resistance, so treat either as a delicate system requiring some babying outdoors.
Samsung’s magnesium alloy chassis felt marginally more robust compared to the polycarbonate Sony shell. Button layouts on the NX500 are better spaced and more tactile - helpful for adjusting settings without looking.
Battery life differences (370 vs. 330 shots per charge) are negligible but a slight Samsung edge.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Lens availability can often make or break a system.
- Samsung NX mount officially supports around 32 lenses, covering primes, zooms, and specialty optics, including fast primes ideal for portrait and low-light shooting.
- Sony’s E-mount is vastly larger with over 120 native lenses available from Sony, Zeiss, Sigma, Tamron, and third-party manufacturers, spanning ultra-wide, telephoto, macro, and cine-grade glass.
This makes Sony better for future-proofing and specialty needs. However, Samsung’s dedicated lens lineup is reliable and sufficient for most enthusiasts.
Connectivity, Storage, and Extras
- Samsung offers built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC for fast image sharing and remote control options.
- Sony provides Wi-Fi but lacks Bluetooth or NFC.
- Both have USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs.
- Storage-wise, both rely on a single card slot supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC. Sony also adds Memory Stick Pro Duo compatibility.
Real-World Performance and Value
Here’s a handy side-by-side look at overall scores from my standardized evaluation:
Samsung NX500 leads in image quality, autofocus, and video; Sony NEX-5R remains competitive with a slight edge in portability.
And across specific photography types:
Samsung consistently outperforms in portraits, landscapes, and video; Sony scores favorably in street and entry-level casual use.
Sample Image Gallery: See for Yourself
Take a look at side-by-side sample shots I took with both cameras under identical conditions.
The Samsung NX500 shots show richer color nuances and finer texture, especially in portrait skin tones and foliage details. Sony’s images are cleaner and more neutral but slightly less detailed.
Who Should Buy Which?
Choose the Samsung NX500 if:
- You demand higher resolution and better image quality for portraits, landscapes, and low-light situations.
- Video in 4K quality matters to you.
- You value a more refined autofocus system with eye detection.
- Ergonomics and handling during long shoots are priorities.
- You want wireless connectivity options like Bluetooth and NFC.
- You can invest a bit more with an eye on future versatility.
Choose the Sony NEX-5R if:
- You want a more compact, pocketable camera with straightforward control layout.
- Budget is tighter but you still want solid APS-C sensor performance.
- You’re entering mirrorless photography or prefer simpler operation.
- Access to a massive native lens ecosystem is a strong selling point.
- You don’t prioritize 4K video or high-resolution stills.
- You are okay with dealing with some manual fine-tuning in focusing and color.
My Final Take: Testing Wisdom and Practical Recommendations
Having tested these cameras extensively, I find the Samsung NX500 to be the better all-around performer, particularly for enthusiasts who want to push the limits of stills and video. Its sensor technology, eye AF, and 4K video recording make it ahead of the curve, even years after release.
That said, Sony’s NEX-5R remains a valid choice for those just starting mirrorless or for street photographers valuing lightness and simplicity. It’s also a bargain if you already own compatible Sony or third-party E-mount lenses.
If you want my personal recommendation for a versatile APS-C mirrorless in this category and price point, I choose the NX500 every time. Just remember - portfolio goals, lens ecosystem, and portability weigh heavily in your final decision.
I hope this hands-on, side-by-side review gives you the confidence to choose wisely based on your photographic ambitions. For specific shooting tips and hands-on demos, check out my detailed video reviews linked above. Happy shooting!
Samsung NX500 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Samsung NX500 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung NX500 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DRIMe 5 | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 28MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6480 x 4320 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 209 | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Samsung NX | Sony E |
Total lenses | 32 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,036k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.265 | AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 287 grams (0.63 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 87 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.8 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.9 | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 1379 | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 shots | 330 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP1130 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 - 30 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $800 | $750 |