Samsung PL120 vs Sigma Quattro
99 Imaging
37 Features
20 Overall
30
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung PL120 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Samsung PL120 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Samsung PL120 vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the PL120 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the PL120 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe PL120 was brought out 6 years earlier than the Quattro and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung PL120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the PL120 grades against the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung PL120 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung PL120 & Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung PL120 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung PL120 over the Sigma Quattro
PL120 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung PL120
Quattro | PL120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | January 2011 | Fresher by 62 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung PL120 and Sigma Quattro
PL120 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Samsung PL120 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung PL120 has got physical dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung PL120 vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the PL120 versus the Quattro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the PL120 and Quattro is 99 and 63 respectively.
Samsung PL120 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the PL120 and Quattro.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The PL120 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro will offer you greater detail having its extra 15MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older PL120 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung PL120 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung PL120 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Samsung PL120 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung PL120 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 29MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | () | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 625 grams (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | - | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $150 | $738 |