Samsung PL200 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung PL200 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Samsung PL200 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and both of them are offered by Samsung. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the PL200 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe PL200 was manufactured 19 months after the SL102 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the PL200 scores versus the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung PL200 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung PL200 and Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung PL200 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Samsung SL102
| PL200 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 19 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung PL200
| SL102 | PL200 |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung PL200 and Samsung SL102
| PL200 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung PL200 offers external dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung PL200 versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the PL200 and the SL102.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the PL200 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the PL200 and SL102.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung PL200 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger PL200 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Samsung PL200 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung PL200 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-07-21 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 170 grams (0.37 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP70A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $130 |