Samsung PL200 vs Samsung TL320
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also Known as WB1000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung PL200 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Samsung PL200 versus Samsung TL320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both offered by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the PL200 (14MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe PL200 was released 18 months later than the TL320 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the PL200 matches up versus the TL320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung PL200 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung PL200 & Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung PL200 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Samsung TL320
| PL200 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Samsung PL200
| TL320 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung PL200 and Samsung TL320
| PL200 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung PL200 offers physical measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has proportions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Samsung PL200 versus Samsung TL320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the PL200 compared to the TL320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the PL200 and TL320 is 94 and 98 respectively.
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the PL200 and TL320.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung PL200 to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The younger PL200 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Samsung PL200 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung PL200 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called as | - | WB1000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-07-21 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 170 grams (0.37 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP70A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $380 |