Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB30F
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Samsung PL200 and Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both are sold by Samsung. The resolution of the PL200 (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is fairly comparable and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe PL200 was launched 3 years prior to the WB30F which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a short view of how the PL200 grades vs the WB30F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung PL200 & Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are available at Samsung PL200 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Samsung WB30F
| PL200 | WB30F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Samsung PL200
| WB30F | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months |
Common features in the Samsung PL200 and Samsung WB30F
| PL200 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Samsung PL200 comes with external dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Samsung PL200 and Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the PL200 compared to the WB30F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the PL200 and WB30F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The image here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the PL200 and WB30F.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB30F to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged PL200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Samsung PL200 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung PL200 | Samsung WB30F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 170 grams (0.37 pounds) | 128 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP70A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $180 |
