Clicky

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31
Samsung PL200 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Samsung PL200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released July 2010
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Samsung. The resolution of the PL200 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The PL200 was announced 3 years before the WB800F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the PL200 matches up against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Samsung WB800F

 PL200 WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung PL200

 WB800F PL200 
IntroducedJanuary 2013July 2010More modern by 30 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Samsung PL200 and Samsung WB800F

 PL200 WB800F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Samsung PL200 has got physical measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the PL200 compared to the WB800F.

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the PL200 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the PL200 and WB800F.

As you have seen, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to provide you with more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged PL200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung PL200 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography info
28
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
44
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Samsung PL200 Street photography features
Samsung WB800F Street photography features
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218g)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Samsung PL200 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB800F Sports photography advice
38
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
53
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers tracking focus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung PL200 Travel photography details
Samsung WB800F Travel photography details
58
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
69
lighter than competition (218g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
no Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Samsung PL200 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
37
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
50
you can focus manually
really wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung PL200 Vlogging info
Samsung WB800F Vlogging info
25
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
35
really wide (23mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (218g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung PL200 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung PL200 and Samsung WB800F
 Samsung PL200Samsung WB800F
General Information
Make Samsung Samsung
Model type Samsung PL200 Samsung WB800F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-07-21 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 31-217mm (7.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.3-5.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.60 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 170 grams (0.37 pounds) 218 grams (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP70A -
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $0 $300