Clicky

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31
Samsung PL200 front
 
Sigma DP3 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
57
Features
33
Overall
47

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung PL200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced July 2010
Sigma DP3 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 75mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Succeeded the Sigma DP2 Merrill
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The resolution of the PL200 (14MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is very close but the PL200 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The PL200 was brought out 3 years earlier than the DP3 Merrill which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the PL200 matches up versus the DP3 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill

 PL200 DP3 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Samsung PL200

 DP3 Merrill PL200 
LaunchedJanuary 2013July 2010Newer by 30 months
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Samsung PL200 and Sigma DP3 Merrill

 PL200 DP3 Merrill 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung PL200 offers outer measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sigma DP3 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Check out the Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the PL200 versus the DP3 Merrill.

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PL200 and DP3 Merrill is 94 and 83 respectively.

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the PL200 and DP3 Merrill.

All in all, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The PL200 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will result in more detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The more aged PL200 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung PL200 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP3 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
74
has manual focus
decent MP (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Samsung PL200 Street photography information
Sigma DP3 Merrill Street photography information
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
65
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung PL200
Sports photography with Sigma DP3 Merrill
38
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
45
decent MP (15 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (75mm)
max frames per second low (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung PL200
Travel photography with Sigma DP3 Merrill
58
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
54
decent MP (15MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Samsung PL200 Landscape photography details
Sigma DP3 Merrill Landscape photography details
37
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Timelapse mode
56
has manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
decent MP (15 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (75mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung PL200 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP3 Merrill as a Vlogging camera
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone jack
22
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung PL200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung PL200 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
 Samsung PL200Sigma DP3 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung PL200 Sigma DP3 Merrill
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-07-21 2013-01-08
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 15 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 4704 x 3136
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 31-217mm (7.0x) 75mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.5 f/2.8
Macro focus range 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s -
Max shutter speed 1/1500s -
Continuous shutter rate - 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.60 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 640 x 480
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 170 grams (0.37 lbs) 330 grams (0.73 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP70A -
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $0 $1,353