Samsung PL200 vs Sigma SD9
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Samsung PL200 and Sigma SD9, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Samsung and Sigma. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the PL200 (14MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the PL200 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe PL200 was brought out 7 years after the SD9 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the PL200 matches up against the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung PL200 & Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung PL200 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Sigma SD9
PL200 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2010 | November 2002 | More modern by 94 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 130k | Clearer display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung PL200
SD9 | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Samsung PL200 and Sigma SD9
PL200 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung PL200 provides outer measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check the Samsung PL200 and Sigma SD9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the PL200 against the SD9.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the PL200 and SD9 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the PL200 and SD9.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The PL200 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Samsung PL200 will render greater detail having its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern PL200 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Samsung PL200 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung PL200 | Sigma SD9 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 130k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 170g (0.37 lbs) | 950g (2.09 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP70A | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $0 | $3,001 |