Samsung PL200 vs Sigma Quattro
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Lets look closer at the Samsung PL200 and Sigma Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the PL200 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the PL200 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe PL200 was introduced 6 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the PL200 matches up against the Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung PL200 & Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung PL200 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Sigma Quattro
PL200 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung PL200
Quattro | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | July 2010 | More modern by 68 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung PL200 and Sigma Quattro
PL200 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Samsung PL200 has outside dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung PL200 and Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the PL200 versus the Quattro.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PL200 and Quattro is 94 and 63 respectively.
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the PL200 and Quattro.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The PL200 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro will offer you more detail using its extra 15 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged PL200 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung PL200 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Samsung PL200 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung PL200 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 170 gr (0.37 pounds) | 625 gr (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP70A | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $0 | $738 |