Samsung PL200 vs Sony HX99
94 Imaging
36 Features
22 Overall
30
91 Imaging
44 Features
67 Overall
53
Samsung PL200 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Introduced September 2018
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Samsung PL200 vs Sony HX99 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Samsung PL200 versus Sony HX99, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the PL200 (14MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the PL200 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) use totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe PL200 was revealed 9 years earlier than the HX99 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the PL200 grades vs the HX99 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung PL200 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung PL200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung PL200 Gallery & Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Sony HX99
| PL200 | HX99 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Samsung PL200
| HX99 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2018 | July 2010 | More recent by 98 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung PL200 and Sony HX99
| PL200 | HX99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.00" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Samsung PL200 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and volume. The Samsung PL200 has got physical measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sony HX99 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") having a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Check out the Samsung PL200 versus Sony HX99 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the PL200 vs the HX99.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the PL200 and HX99 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Samsung PL200 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the PL200 and HX99.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The PL200 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX99 will offer you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older PL200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung PL200 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung PL200 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
| Samsung PL200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung PL200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-21 | 2018-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 170 grams (0.37 pounds) | 242 grams (0.53 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP70A | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $469 |