Clicky

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31
Samsung PL200 front
 
Sony SLT-A68 front
Portability
64
Imaging
66
Features
70
Overall
67

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68 Key Specs

Samsung PL200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced July 2010
Sony A68
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
  • Launched November 2015
  • Succeeded the Sony A65
Photography Glossary

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Samsung PL200 and Sony A68, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the PL200 (14MP) and A68 (24MP) and the PL200 (1/2.3") and A68 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The PL200 was introduced 6 years earlier than the A68 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the PL200 matches up versus the A68 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Sony A68

 PL200 A68 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Samsung PL200

 A68 PL200 
LaunchedNovember 2015July 2010More modern by 64 months
Manually focus More exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution461k230kClearer display (+231k dot)

Common features in the Samsung PL200 and Sony A68

 PL200 A68 
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung PL200 offers outer measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony A68 has dimensions of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).

Analyze the Samsung PL200 and Sony A68 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the PL200 against the A68.

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the PL200 and A68 is 94 and 64 respectively.

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68 top view buttons comparison

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The image below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the PL200 and A68.

As you have seen, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The PL200 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony A68 will deliver greater detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged PL200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68 sensor size comparison

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung PL200 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A68 as a Portrait photography camera
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
79
manual focus
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Samsung PL200 Street photography information
Sony A68 Street photography information
57
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
77
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
above average ISO range (25,600)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Samsung PL200 Sports photography info
Sony A68 Sports photography info
38
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
low battery life (510 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Samsung PL200 Travel photography features
Sony A68 Travel photography features
58
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
54
decent megapixels (24MP)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
low battery life (510 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Samsung PL200 Landscape photography information
Sony A68 Landscape photography information
37
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse function
67
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
low battery life (510 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung PL200 Vlogging advice
Sony A68 Vlogging advice
25
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone port
35
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external microphone socket
screen is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung PL200 vs Sony A68 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung PL200 and Sony A68
 Samsung PL200Sony SLT-A68
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung PL200 Sony SLT-A68
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2010-07-21 2015-11-06
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 79
Cross type focus points - 15
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 31-217mm (7.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.3-5.5 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 461 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.57x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.60 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 170 grams (0.37 pounds) 610 grams (1.34 pounds)
Dimensions 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 79
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 24.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 701
Other
Battery life - 510 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP70A NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec))
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $0 $581