Samsung SH100 vs Samsung WB800F
99 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung SH100 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SH100 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Samsung SH100 and Samsung WB800F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Samsung. The image resolution of the SH100 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively similar and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH100 was unveiled 24 months prior to the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SH100 matches up vs the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Samsung SH100 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SH100 & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are provided at Samsung SH100 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Samsung WB800F
| SH100 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung SH100
| WB800F | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SH100 and Samsung WB800F
| SH100 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Samsung SH100 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SH100 has got physical measurements of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SH100 and Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the SH100 against the WB800F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH100 and WB800F is 99 and 92 respectively.
Samsung SH100 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH100 and WB800F.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB800F to offer you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older SH100 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SH100 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung SH100 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung SH100 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SH100 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-04 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Highest Possible resolution | 4230 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $200 | $300 |