Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V
99 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
![Samsung SH100 front Samsung SH100 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SH100/Samsung-SH100-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX200V/Sony-TX200V-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Samsung SH100 and Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the SH100 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The SH100 was released 13 months prior to the TX200V making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SH100 matches up against the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SH100 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung SH100 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Sony TX200V
SH100 | TX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Samsung SH100
TX200V | SH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 13 months |
Display size | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SH100 and Sony TX200V
SH100 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SH100 provides exterior measurements of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SH100 and Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SH100 against the TX200V.
![Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V size comparison Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-SH100-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX200V-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH100 and TX200V is 99 and 96 respectively.
![Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-SH100-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX200V-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH100 and TX200V.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Sony TX200V to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images way more aggressively. The older SH100 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-SH100-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX200V-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-SH100-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX200V-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Samsung SH100 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Samsung SH100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung SH100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-01-04 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4230 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | - | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $200 | $500 |