Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST150F
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and they are both created by Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and ST150F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SL102 was launched 5 years before the ST150F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the SL102 grades versus the ST150F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL102 & Samsung ST150F. The complete galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung ST150F
| SL102 | ST150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Samsung SL102
| ST150F | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung ST150F
| SL102 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 offers physical measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST150F has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST150F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the SL102 vs the ST150F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and ST150F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SL102 and ST150F.
As you can see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung ST150F to produce more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older SL102 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Samsung ST150F |
| Also called as | ES55 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lb) | 114 grams (0.25 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $300 |