Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST30
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
98 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 87g - 82 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST30 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung ST30, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are built by Samsung. The image resolution of the SL102 (10MP) and the ST30 (10MP) is pretty close but the SL102 (1/2.3") and ST30 (1/3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL102 was revealed 24 months earlier than the ST30 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SL102 grades vs the ST30 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL102 and Samsung ST30. The full galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Samsung ST30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung ST30
| SL102 | ST30 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST30 over the Samsung SL102
| ST30 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 24 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung ST30
| SL102 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST30 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 offers outer dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST30 has measurements of 82mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 87 grams (0.19 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung ST30 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SL102 vs the ST30.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SL102 and ST30 is 96 and 98 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST30 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL102 and ST30.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The SL102 provides the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The older SL102 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST30 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung ST30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Samsung ST30 |
| Also called | ES55 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | () |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lb) | 87 grams (0.19 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 82 x 52 x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $55 |
