Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST600
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Samsung SL102 and Samsung ST600, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both sold by Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and ST600 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL102 was brought out 12 months earlier than the ST600 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SL102 matches up against the ST600 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL102 & Samsung ST600. The entire galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung ST600
| SL102 | ST600 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Samsung SL102
| ST600 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+922k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung ST600
| SL102 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL102 provides external dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST600 has proportions of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Samsung SL102 and Samsung ST600 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SL102 against the ST600.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and ST600 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and ST600.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung ST600 to offer extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged SL102 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung ST600 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Samsung ST600 |
| Also called as | ES55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB07 |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $130 | $330 |