Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL205
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is PL100
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung TL205, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both built by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SL102 (10MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL102 was brought out 12 months earlier than the TL205 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the SL102 matches up versus the TL205 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 & Samsung TL205. The entire galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung TL205
| SL102 | TL205 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Samsung SL102
| TL205 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung TL205
| SL102 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 offers external dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung TL205 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the SL102 vs the TL205.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and TL205 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The picture here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and TL205.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung TL205 to render extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SL102 will be behind in sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Samsung TL205 |
| Also called | ES55 | PL100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116g (0.26 pounds) | 177g (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $130 | $180 |