Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL225
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Additionally referred to as ST550
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL225, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are created by Samsung. The image resolution of the SL102 (10MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SL102 was announced 7 months before the TL225 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the SL102 matches up vs the TL225 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 & Samsung TL225. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung TL225
| SL102 | TL225 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Samsung SL102
| TL225 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2009 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 7 months |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+922k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung TL225
| SL102 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 features external measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL225 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the SL102 and the TL225.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SL102 and TL225 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The picture below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SL102 and TL225.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung TL225 to show greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged SL102 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Samsung TL225 |
| Otherwise known as | ES55 | ST550 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) | 187 grams (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $488 |