Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL240
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Samsung SL102 and Samsung TL240, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are offered by Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and TL240 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SL102 was unveiled 12 months before the TL240 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the SL102 grades versus the TL240 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL102 & Samsung TL240. The full galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung TL240
| SL102 | TL240 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Samsung SL102
| TL240 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung TL240
| SL102 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 has external measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Samsung SL102 and Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the SL102 vs the TL240.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and TL240 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The pic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SL102 and TL240.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung TL240 to render greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SL102 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also Known as | ES55 | ST5000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116g (0.26 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $130 | $171 |
