Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL320
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally Known as WB1000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Samsung SL102 and Samsung TL320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact and both are created by Samsung. The image resolution of the SL102 (10MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is very close and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SL102 was revealed very close to the TL320 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SL102 grades against the TL320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 & Samsung TL320. The full galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung TL320
| SL102 | TL320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Samsung SL102
| TL320 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung TL320
| SL102 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung SL102 provides outer dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SL102 and Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the SL102 against the TL320.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and TL320 is 96 and 98 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL102 and TL320.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung TL320 to render greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also Known as | ES55 | WB1000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116g (0.26 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $380 |
