Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB1100F
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Introduced January 2014
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung WB1100F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and WB1100F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL102 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WB1100F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the SL102 grades versus the WB1100F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL102 & Samsung WB1100F. The entire galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung WB1100F
SL102 | WB1100F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Samsung SL102
WB1100F | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 60 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB1100F
SL102 | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung SL102 comes with external dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Samsung WB1100F has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") and a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung WB1100F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SL102 vs the WB1100F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SL102 and WB1100F is 96 and 67 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The picture below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and WB1100F.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB1100F to deliver more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged SL102 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB1100F |
Also Known as | ES55 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) | 512 grams (1.13 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $130 | $250 |