Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB150F
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB150F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SL102 was announced 4 years before the WB150F and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SL102 scores versus the WB150F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL102 & Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung WB150F
| SL102 | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Samsung SL102
| WB150F | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB150F
| SL102 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 has outside measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB150F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SL102 vs the WB150F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and WB150F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by reading specs. The photograph here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SL102 and WB150F.
All in all, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB150F to offer you extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older SL102 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB150F |
| Also referred to as | ES55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $130 | $230 |
