Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB2200F
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung WB2200F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SL102 was unveiled 6 years before the WB2200F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SL102 grades vs the WB2200F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 & Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung WB2200F
| SL102 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Samsung SL102
| WB2200F | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 60 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB2200F
| SL102 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung SL102 has got exterior dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has sizing of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
See the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the SL102 compared to the WB2200F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SL102 and WB2200F is 96 and 59 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and WB2200F.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB2200F to result in greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged SL102 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Otherwise known as | ES55 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) | 708 grams (1.56 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $130 | $599 |