Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB250F
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung WB250F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL102 was unveiled 5 years before the WB250F which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the SL102 scores against the WB250F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung WB250F
| SL102 | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Samsung SL102
| WB250F | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB250F
| SL102 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 comes with outer dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the SL102 vs the WB250F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and WB250F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The image here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and WB250F.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB250F to show more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged SL102 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB250F |
| Also Known as | ES55 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $130 | $250 |
