Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SL102 was announced 5 years prior to the WB800F which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the SL102 grades versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung WB800F
| SL102 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung SL102
| WB800F | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB800F
| SL102 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Samsung SL102 offers outer measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB800F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the SL102 and the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SL102 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB800F to resolve extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SL102 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also referred to as | ES55 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $300 |