Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1x
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
88 Imaging
44 Features
27 Overall
37
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 28mm (F4.0) lens
- 250g - 113 x 60 x 50mm
- Launched February 2010
- Succeeded the Sigma DP1s
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1x Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Samsung SL102 versus Sigma DP1x, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and DP1x (5MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and DP1x (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SL102 was launched 13 months earlier than the DP1x making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SL102 scores versus the DP1x when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1x Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP1x. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Sigma DP1x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma DP1x
SL102 | DP1x |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1x over the Samsung SL102
DP1x | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 13 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP1x
SL102 | DP1x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 2.5" | 2.5" | Equal display measurement | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1x Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL102 features exterior dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sigma DP1x has dimensions of 113mm x 60mm x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL102 versus Sigma DP1x in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the SL102 vs the DP1x.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and DP1x is 96 and 88 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1x Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The pic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and DP1x.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SL102 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Samsung SL102 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged SL102 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1x Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP1x Specifications
Samsung SL102 | Sigma DP1x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung SL102 | Sigma DP1x |
Alternate name | ES55 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 320x240 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) | 250 grams (0.55 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 113 x 60 x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $130 | $574 |