Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
86 Imaging
44 Features
28 Overall
37
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Released September 2009
- New Model is Sigma DP2s
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and DP2 (5MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and DP2 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL102 was released 8 months earlier than the DP2 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SL102 grades versus the DP2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL102 & Sigma DP2. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma DP2
SL102 | DP2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 over the Samsung SL102
DP2 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2009 | January 2009 | Newer by 8 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP2
SL102 | DP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 2.5" | 2.5" | Same screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 has got physical measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 has measurements of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") along with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the SL102 vs the DP2.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and DP2 is 96 and 86 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SL102 and DP2.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SL102 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung SL102 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged SL102 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Specifications
Samsung SL102 | Sigma DP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung SL102 | Sigma DP2 |
Also called | ES55 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 5MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2640 x 1760 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 320x240 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) | 280 grams (0.62 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $130 | $649 |