Clicky

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28
Samsung SL102 front
 
Sigma DP2 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
56
Features
33
Overall
46

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2009
  • Alternative Name is ES55
Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 50mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Announced February 2012
  • Replaced the Sigma DP1 Merrill
  • Successor is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview

Lets look closer at the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sigma. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SL102 was brought out 4 years prior to the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the SL102 grades versus the DP2 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill

 SL102 DP2 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Samsung SL102

 DP2 Merrill SL102 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012January 2009More recent by 37 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP2 Merrill

 SL102 DP2 Merrill 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Samsung SL102 has got physical measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Compare the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the SL102 compared to the DP2 Merrill.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SL102 and DP2 Merrill is 96 and 83 respectively.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing technical specs. The photograph below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SL102 and DP2 Merrill.

As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SL102 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will show more detail having its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older SL102 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL102 Portrait photography info
Sigma DP2 Merrill Portrait photography info
25
features face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
73
has manual focus
decent megapixels (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Merrill as a Street photography camera
55
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
65
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
44
decent megapixels (15 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL102 Travel photography factors
Sigma DP2 Merrill Travel photography factors
62
lighter than competition in class (116g)
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
54
decent megapixels (15 megapixels)
no Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung SL102
Landscape photography with Sigma DP2 Merrill
27
great maximum aperture (f)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
small screen (2.5")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
55
has manual focus
screen size is good (3 inches)
decent megapixels (15 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
no Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL102 Vlogging highlights
Sigma DP2 Merrill Vlogging highlights
30
great maximum aperture (f)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (116g)
wide angle not great (35mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic support
22
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
 Samsung SL102Sigma DP2 Merrill
General Information
Brand Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung SL102 Sigma DP2 Merrill
Also called as ES55 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2012-02-08
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 15 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4704 x 3136
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 50mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds -
Max shutter speed 1/1500 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed - 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640x480
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 116 gr (0.26 lbs) 330 gr (0.73 lbs)
Dimensions 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $130 $931