Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SL102 was revealed 6 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SL102 matches up against the DP2 Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
SL102 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Samsung SL102
DP2 Quattro | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | January 2009 | Fresher by 62 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
SL102 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL102 offers outside dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the SL102 and the DP2 Quattro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and DP2 Quattro.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SL102 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older SL102 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Samsung SL102 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung SL102 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Also Known as | ES55 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 116g (0.26 lbs) | 395g (0.87 lbs) |
Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $130 | $931 |