Clicky

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28
Samsung SL102 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
  • Alternate Name is ES55
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here is a complete analysis of the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SL102 was revealed 6 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SL102 matches up against the DP2 Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 SL102 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Samsung SL102

 DP2 Quattro SL102 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014January 2009Fresher by 62 months
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 SL102 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL102 offers outside dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the SL102 and the DP2 Quattro.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and DP2 Quattro.

As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SL102 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older SL102 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung SL102
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
25
offers face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
77
has manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
saves RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
55
lighter than competition (116g)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
61
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung SL102
Sports photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
48
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL102 Travel photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography information
62
lighter than competition (116 grams)
flash built-in
fast max aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
53
MP count decent (20MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL102 Landscape photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography features
27
fast max aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
59
has manual focus
screen size is good (3 inches)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL102 Vlogging info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging info
30
fast max aperture (f)
offers face detect focus
lighter than competition (116 grams)
wide angle not great (35mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone socket
9
no video shooting
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Samsung SL102Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung SL102 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Also Known as ES55 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 45mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus range 10cm -
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 116g (0.26 lbs) 395g (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-51
Self timer Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $130 $931