Clicky

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28
Samsung SL102 front
 
Sigma DP3 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
56
Features
33
Overall
46

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
  • Alternative Name is ES55
Sigma DP3 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 75mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Previous Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Samsung SL102 versus Sigma DP3 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and DP3 Merrill (15MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SL102 was introduced 5 years before the DP3 Merrill which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going through a full comparison, below is a short view of how the SL102 grades against the DP3 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill

 SL102 DP3 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Samsung SL102

 DP3 Merrill SL102 
LaunchedJanuary 2013January 2009Newer by 48 months
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP3 Merrill

 SL102 DP3 Merrill 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 has outside dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP3 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Check out the Samsung SL102 versus Sigma DP3 Merrill in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the SL102 compared to the DP3 Merrill.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and DP3 Merrill is 96 and 83 respectively.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The picture here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and DP3 Merrill.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SL102 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will provide you with greater detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SL102 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung SL102
Portrait photography with Sigma DP3 Merrill
25
supports face detect focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
73
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung SL102
Street photography with Sigma DP3 Merrill
55
lighter than average (116g)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
65
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP3 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
44
sensor resolution is decent (15MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (75mm)
low fps (4.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP3 Merrill as a Travel photography camera
62
lighter than average (116 grams)
built-in flash
good max aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low resolution (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
54
sensor resolution is decent (15MP)
no Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL102 Landscape photography factors
Sigma DP3 Merrill Landscape photography factors
27
good max aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
tiny screen (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
55
manual focus
decent sized screen (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (15MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (75mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL102 Vlogging factors
Sigma DP3 Merrill Vlogging factors
30
good max aperture (f)
supports face detect focus
lighter than average (116g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
22
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung SL102 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL102 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
 Samsung SL102Sigma DP3 Merrill
General Information
Brand Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung SL102 Sigma DP3 Merrill
Also referred to as ES55 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-01-08 2013-01-08
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 15 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4704 x 3136
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 75mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs -
Max shutter speed 1/1500 secs -
Continuous shutter speed - 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 116 gr (0.26 lbs) 330 gr (0.73 lbs)
Dimensions 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal -
Storage slots One One
Price at release $130 $1,353