Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD1
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
77 Imaging
55 Features
43 Overall
50
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed September 2010
- Later Model is Sigma SD1 Merrill
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD1 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Samsung and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and SD1 (15MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and SD1 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL102 was announced 20 months before the SD1 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SL102 grades vs the SD1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 and Sigma SD1. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma SD1
SL102 | SD1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 over the Samsung SL102
SD1 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2010 | January 2009 | More recent by 20 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma SD1
SL102 | SD1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL102 has got exterior measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 has dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the SL102 versus the SD1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and SD1 is 96 and 77 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The photograph here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SL102 and SD1.
All in all, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SL102 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sigma SD1 will resolve greater detail with its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older SL102 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD1 Specifications
Samsung SL102 | Sigma SD1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung SL102 | Sigma SD1 |
Also called | ES55 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4800 x 3200 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 2 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 15s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $130 | $2,339 |