Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD14
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
59 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Launched September 2006
- Replaced the Sigma SD10
- Successor is Sigma SD15
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD14 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD14, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Samsung and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SL102 was revealed 2 years later than the SD14 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SL102 scores versus the SD14 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 & Sigma SD14. The full galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma SD14
SL102 | SD14 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | September 2006 | More recent by 28 months | |
Display resolution | 230k | 150k | Sharper display (+80k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Samsung SL102
SD14 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma SD14
SL102 | SD14 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 2.5" | 2.5" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL102 has got outer measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD14 has dimensions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") and a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD14 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the SL102 and the SD14.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and SD14 is 96 and 59 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SL102 and SD14.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SL102 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung SL102 will give greater detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The newer SL102 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
Samsung SL102 | Sigma SD14 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung SL102 | Sigma SD14 |
Also called as | ES55 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2006-09-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2640 x 1760 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 150 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) | 750 grams (1.65 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | $198 |