Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD9
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released November 2002
- Newer Model is Sigma SD10
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Samsung SL102 and Sigma SD9, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL102 was announced 6 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SL102 scores vs the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL102 and Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma SD9
| SL102 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2009 |  | November 2002 | More recent by 75 months |
| Display sizing | 2.5" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.7") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Crisper display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung SL102
| SD9 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma SD9
| SL102 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung SL102 provides outer dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SL102 and Sigma SD9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the SL102 against the SD9.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and SD9 is 96 and 54 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and SD9.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SL102 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung SL102 will result in greater detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer SL102 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Sigma SD9 |
| Otherwise known as | ES55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 130k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116g (0.26 lb) | 950g (2.09 lb) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $130 | $3,001 |
