Samsung SL102 vs Sigma Quattro
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SL102 was announced 8 years earlier than the Quattro and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the SL102 scores versus the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 & Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sigma Quattro
SL102 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung SL102
Quattro | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | January 2009 | Fresher by 86 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sigma Quattro
SL102 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Samsung SL102 enjoys outside measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL102 vs Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SL102 vs the Quattro.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and Quattro is 96 and 63 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The photograph here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SL102 and Quattro.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SL102 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will give greater detail with its extra 19 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older SL102 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SL102 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Samsung SL102 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung SL102 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Alternative name | ES55 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 29MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) | 625 gr (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $130 | $738 |