Samsung SL102 vs Sony A6300
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Samsung SL102 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Released February 2016
- Succeeded the Sony A6000
- Newer Model is Sony A6500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL102 vs Sony A6300 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Samsung SL102 vs Sony A6300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SL102 was revealed 8 years earlier than the A6300 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SL102 grades vs the A6300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL102 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL102 & Sony Alpha a6300. The full galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony A6300
| SL102 | A6300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Samsung SL102
| A6300 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | January 2009 | Fresher by 86 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony A6300
| SL102 | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung SL102 offers physical dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL102 vs Sony A6300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the SL102 and the A6300.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and A6300 is 96 and 83 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The visual here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL102 and A6300.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SL102 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A6300 will give you more detail because of its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The older SL102 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung SL102 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
| Also referred to as | ES55 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2016-02-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 11.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) | 404 grams (0.89 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 85 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $130 | $889 |