Samsung SL102 vs Sony HX300
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
63 Imaging
43 Features
51 Overall
46
Samsung SL102 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Older Model is Sony HX200V
- Later Model is Sony HX400V
Photography Glossary Samsung SL102 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Samsung SL102 vs Sony HX300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe SL102 was unveiled 5 years prior to the HX300 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SL102 grades against the HX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL102 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL102 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The full galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony HX300
| SL102 | HX300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Samsung SL102
| HX300 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2013 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 50 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony HX300
| SL102 | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung SL102 provides outside measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has specifications of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL102 vs Sony HX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SL102 vs the HX300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and HX300 is 96 and 63 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing specifications. The graphic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SL102 and HX300.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Sony HX300 to result in greater detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older SL102 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung SL102 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Also called | ES55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) | 623 gr (1.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $339 |