Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX10
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX10 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Samsung SL102 and Sony QX10, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Lens-style by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and QX10 (18MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SL102 was announced 5 years prior to the QX10 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SL102 scores versus the QX10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL102 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony QX10
| SL102 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.5" |  | " | Bigger screen (+2.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Samsung SL102
| QX10 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2013 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 56 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony QX10
| SL102 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL102 has got physical measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Sony QX10 has dimensions of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung SL102 and Sony QX10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the SL102 and the QX10.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and QX10 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The picture here may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SL102 and QX10.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Sony QX10 to give you more detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged SL102 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
| Otherwise known as | ES55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2013-09-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | - |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1600s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | None |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1440x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $250 |