Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX30
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
91 Imaging
44 Features
37 Overall
41
Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Launched September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX30 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Samsung SL102 versus Sony QX30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and QX30 (20MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SL102 was brought out 6 years before the QX30 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SL102 grades vs the QX30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL102 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony QX30
| SL102 | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 2.5" | " | Bigger screen (+2.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Samsung SL102
| QX30 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 68 months | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony QX30
| SL102 | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 comes with outside dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony QX30 has measurements of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Samsung SL102 versus Sony QX30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SL102 versus the QX30.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and QX30 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL102 and QX30.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Sony QX30 to offer you extra detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged SL102 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung SL102 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
| Otherwise known as | ES55 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | - |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116g (0.26 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $348 |