Clicky

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
21
Overall
27
Samsung SL102 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
51
Features
77
Overall
61

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
  • Other Name is ES55
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Introduced March 2016
  • Superseded the Sony RX10 II
  • Replacement is Sony RX10 IV
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SL102 was revealed 8 years earlier than the RX10 III which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the SL102 grades against the RX10 III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony RX10 III

 SL102 RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Samsung SL102

 RX10 III SL102 
IntroducedMarch 2016January 2009More modern by 87 months
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1229k230kClearer display (+999k dot)

Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony RX10 III

 SL102 RX10 III 
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL102 provides external measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") and a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Examine the Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the SL102 and the RX10 III.

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and RX10 III is 96 and 53 respectively.

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SL102 and RX10 III.

As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SL102 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX10 III will give extra detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SL102 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Portrait photography camera
24
has face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
no external flash support
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
70
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
supports face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Street Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Street photography camera
55
lighter than average in class (116g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
63
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (1")
exports RAW formats
environment proof
more heavy than average in class (1,051g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung SL102
Sports photography with Sony RX10 III
16
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
69
long zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
supports tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery power (420 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Samsung SL102 as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Travel photography camera
61
lighter than average in class (116 grams)
has built in flash
fast max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
55
better than average battery power (420 per charge)
environment proof
MP count good (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (600mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (1,051g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Samsung SL102 Landscape photography details
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography details
26
fast max aperture (f)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
small screen (2.5 inch)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
63
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
exports RAW formats
environment proof
better than average battery power (420 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
does not have Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung SL102 Vlogging advice
Sony RX10 III Vlogging advice
29
fast max aperture (f)
has face detection focus
lighter than average in class (116g)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic socket
28
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does have external microphone port
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
more heavy than average in class (1,051g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung SL102 and Sony RX10 III
 Samsung SL102Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung SL102 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Otherwise known as ES55 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-01-08 2016-03-29
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 80 125
RAW files
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing range 10cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 2.7
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/1500s 1/2000s
Highest quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed - 14.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 116g (0.26 lbs) 1051g (2.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 70
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Retail price $130 $1,398