Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 IV
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
52 Imaging
52 Features
82 Overall
64
Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed September 2017
- Previous Model is Sony RX10 III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Here, we are comparing the Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 IV, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and RX10 IV (20MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") boast different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SL102 was manufactured 9 years earlier than the RX10 IV which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SL102 scores vs the RX10 IV for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony RX10 IV
| SL102 | RX10 IV |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Samsung SL102
| RX10 IV | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2017 | January 2009 | Newer by 105 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1440k | 230k | Sharper display (+1210k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony RX10 IV
| SL102 | RX10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL102 enjoys outer dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 IV has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 IV in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the SL102 and the RX10 IV.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and RX10 IV is 96 and 52 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The pic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL102 and RX10 IV.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SL102 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sony RX10 IV will show more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SL102 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
| Also referred to as | ES55 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2017-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,440k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 24.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) | 1095 gr (2.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $130 | $1,698 |