Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX100 IV
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
89 Imaging
51 Features
79 Overall
62
Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX100 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 298g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Announced June 2015
- Succeeded the Sony RX100 III
- New Model is Sony RX100 V
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX100 IV Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Samsung SL102 versus Sony RX100 IV, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and RX100 IV (20MP) and the SL102 (1/2.3") and RX100 IV (1") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL102 was revealed 7 years earlier than the RX100 IV and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 IV being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the SL102 grades vs the RX100 IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX100 IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL102 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Sony RX100 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Sony RX100 IV
| SL102 | RX100 IV |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 IV over the Samsung SL102
| RX100 IV | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2015 | January 2009 | More recent by 78 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper display (+999k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Sony RX100 IV
| SL102 | RX100 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX100 IV Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung SL102 has outer dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 IV has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") with a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs).
Check out the Samsung SL102 versus Sony RX100 IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the SL102 and the RX100 IV.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and RX100 IV is 96 and 89 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX100 IV Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and RX100 IV.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SL102 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony RX100 IV will show greater detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The older SL102 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX100 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung SL102 vs Sony RX100 IV Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV |
| Alternate name | ES55 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2015-06-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 16.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) | 298 grams (0.66 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 562 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 280 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $898 |